Sales forecasting is essential for business planning. But should you rely on data-driven models (quantitative forecasting) or expert insights (qualitative forecasting)?
The truth is, both have their place—depending on your market, data availability, and industry trends.
Outline:
Sales forecasting helps businesses plan resources, track performance, and make informed decisions.
There are two main approaches:
Ideally, you should use both methods—quantitative data to establish baselines and qualitative insights to refine trends and become anti-fragile.
Keep reading to learn how to apply this!
Qualitative sales forecasting focuses on human expertise to predict sales, especially when historical data is scarce or market conditions are shifting quickly.
Unlike data-heavy methods, this approach leans on expert judgment and intuition to fill in the gaps. However, it requires careful execution to avoid pitfalls like personal bias.
Expert Opinion Method: Gathers insights from professionals with deep market knowledge.
Example: A company planning to launch an innovative tech gadget consults industry experts to predict market reception and potential sales.
Delphi Method: A structured process where experts provide anonymous feedback over several rounds. It's particularly useful for long-term industry predictions.
Example: A tech company gathers anonymous expert opinions on future smartphone trends, refining predictions through multiple rounds until a consensus is reached.
Market Research: Involves tools like surveys, focus groups, and interviews.
Example: Before introducing a new product line, a fashion retailer conducts surveys and focus groups to understand customer preferences and current fashion trends.
While it has its downsides, qualitative forecasting shines in situations where data is limited or unreliable, making it a go-to choice for new markets or groundbreaking products.
Quantitative forecasting shines in data-rich environments, relying on historical data and statistical models to produce numerical predictions.
Unlike qualitative methods, it prioritizes objectivity over personal judgment.
This approach focuses on identifying historical trends through statistical models to deliver accurate numerical forecasts.
Example: A clothing retailer analyzes the past five years of sales data to predict demand for winter coats in the upcoming season.
Using time-series analysis and regression models, they identify a consistent 8% annual increase in sales during colder months.
Based on this trend, the retailer adjusts inventory levels to meet customer demand while minimizing excess stock.
There are several widely used techniques in quantitative forecasting:
Time Series Analysis: This method uses past data trends to predict future outcomes, making it ideal for businesses in stable markets with clear seasonal patterns.
Example: Retailers use time series models like ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) to forecast sales trends based on past performance.
Regression Analysis: By studying relationships between sales and factors like pricing, marketing, or economic conditions, this method uncovers the key drivers of sales performance.
Example: Airlines use regression analysis to predict demand by examining how factors like ticket prices, holidays, and fuel costs impact bookings.
Machine Learning Models: AI-powered models can process massive datasets to identify subtle patterns.
Example: E-commerce companies use machine learning for demand forecasting, helping optimize inventory levels across their global warehouses.
While it has drawbacks, quantitative forecasting excels in stable markets with rich historical data, providing high accuracy, automation, and objective predictions.
Deciding between these methods depends on three main factors:
You also need to consider your resources. Quantitative forecasting relies on advanced software, skilled analysts, and solid data systems.
Meanwhile, qualitative forecasting depends on industry experts and strong market research.
Each method has its strengths, but combining them can lead to impressive results.
Check out the conclusion of this survey from the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
“Human forecasters are able to use contextual data to inform their judgment, something that purely quantitative models are not capable of if the context is not represented in the dataset. Also, humans tend to outperform the accuracy of quantitatively generated forecasts if data are sparse.
Contrastingly, quantitative techniques can survey and learn from vast datasets that would overwhelm human cognitive abilities.”
For new markets:
For established businesses:
They differ in their methods and data sources. Quantitative forecasting uses numerical data and statistical models, making it ideal for established markets with plenty of historical data.
Qualitative forecasting relies on expert opinions, market knowledge, and subjective judgment, which is especially helpful when data is unavailable or outdated.
This distinction explains why quantitative methods work well in stable markets, while qualitative approaches are better suited for scenarios like new product launches.
The choice between these approaches depends on the business context and the data available.
Quantitative methods are great for stable markets with reliable historical data, offering consistency and minimizing bias. Meanwhile, qualitative methods add context and insights that raw numbers can't provide.
A combined approach often delivers the best results. For example, a company might use quantitative models to create baseline predictions and refine them with qualitative input from market experts and sales teams to account for trends or unexpected changes.
Qualitative forecasting is particularly useful in situations like:
In these cases, relying on expert insights can be more relevant than using outdated or irrelevant historical data. This approach helps businesses stay agile in uncertain or evolving conditions.